The summit, chaired by the President of the Republic of Tajikistan Emomali Rahmon, was attended by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, the President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko, the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, the President of the Kyrgyz Republic Sadyr Japarov, the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, the President of Turkmenistan Serdar Berdimuhamedov, the Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan, and CIS Secretary-General Sergey Lebedev.

The agenda focused on pressing issues related to strengthening and expanding practical cooperation within the Commonwealth.
At the beginning of his address, the President of Uzbekistan noted that despite the unpredictable developments in global politics and the economy, as well as the declining role of international institutions, the CIS continues to demonstrate resilience, efficiency, and relevance.
Thanks to mechanisms and partnerships established over decades, the Commonwealth maintains close cooperation across a wide range of economic, social, and humanitarian areas.

“We are interested in further strengthening cooperation within the CIS and enhancing the effectiveness of practical interaction with countries that are our natural partners”, the President of Uzbekistan said.
The Head of State then put forward several proposals and initiatives aimed at expanding practical cooperation within the Commonwealth of Independent States.
The unconditional priority of the Organization was defined as the expansion of economic partnership, given the deteriorating situation in the global economy, the rise of protectionism, and emerging challenges to sustainable development.

It was noted with satisfaction that Uzbekistan’s trade turnover with CIS partners increased by 11 percent last year and continues to grow this year. Such results are attributed to the deepening of intersectoral cooperation and the growth of mutual investment flows.
To make fuller use of existing resources and maintain the achieved pace and dynamics of cooperation, the President of Uzbekistan proposed focusing joint efforts on the following priority areas.
First, the further creation of favorable conditions for expanding trade turnover.

The need to simplify procedures and requirements for the supply of certain goods, particularly agricultural products, and for access to national markets, including public procurement, was emphasized.
Attention was also drawn to the importance of launching rapid-response mechanisms within the CIS Economic Council to adapt to changes in external market conditions and redirect trade flows. The President underscored the need to accelerate the coordination of draft agreements on technical barriers to trade and mutual recognition of conformity assessment documents.
Second, the deepening of cooperation in the field of transport was identified as a key priority.

It was noted that bottlenecks persist in the CIS transport network, reducing the efficiency of existing corridors. In this regard, the establishment of information and logistics centers integrated across all modes of transport was deemed essential.
Considering the importance of attracting private investment for the modernization of freight transport infrastructure, the President proposed to hold a conference in Uzbekistan on expanding public–private partnership in the transport sector.
Third, stimulating mutual investment growth and supporting cooperation projects.

In this regard, it was proposed to develop a roadmap for supporting the development of special economic and industrial zones, as well as establishing a CIS Venture Platform to deepen cooperation and promote innovative startups with private sector participation. It was also suggested to hold an Innovation Industry Forum in Tashkent next year as part of the INNOPROM exhibition.
Fourth, enhancing energy cooperation.
The President of Uzbekistan noted that several major strategic projects are currently being implemented jointly with CIS partners in the field of traditional and alternative energy, including the construction of a nuclear power plant.
He called for the development and implementation of a long-term Program for the Innovative Development of the Energy Sector across CIS countries.
Fifth, cooperation in the field of digitalization.
The President of Uzbekistan noted that the International Forum “Development of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the CIS”, held in Samarkand this August, demonstrated the growing mutual interest and potential for cooperation among member states. In this regard, he proposed developing a multilateral Action Plan to deepen practical cooperation in this field.
The Head of State also emphasized the importance of expanding joint projects and programs in the fields of science, education, culture, and the arts.
“Considering the dynamic development of the education sector and labor markets in our countries, we propose drafting a new Interstate Agreement on the Mutual Recognition of Diplomas, Qualifications, and Academic Programs, as well as introducing a Mechanism for the Harmonization of Professional Standards and Qualification Requirements”, the President said.
Uzbekistan also expressed its readiness to host the CIS Youth Forum in Khiva next year, with the agenda to include the establishment of a Youth Innovation Lab aimed at fostering an innovative ecosystem and supporting the creative and intellectual potential of the younger generation.
Addressing issues of regional security, the President of Uzbekistan emphasized the importance of maintaining systematic and close contacts between the foreign ministries and special services. The situation in Afghanistan requires particular attention.
“Uzbekistan remains firmly committed to ensuring long-term peace, stability, and sustainable development in Afghanistan. In this regard, we propose exploring opportunities for joint participation in major investment and infrastructure projects in this country”, the President stated.
In conclusion, Shavkat Mirziyoyev expressed his support for the reappointment of Sergey Lebedev as Secretary-General of the CIS and extended best wishes to the President of Turkmenistan Serdar Berdimuhamedov on assuming the chairmanship of the Organization.
During the meeting, heads of delegations from other CIS member states also delivered their remarks.
The summit concluded with the signing of a package of agreements and decisions aimed at strengthening cooperation across the priority areas within the Commonwealth of Independent States.
UzA
The lives and scholarly legacy of the jurists who lived in Bukhara centuries ago and combined the principles of justice with knowledge — scholars remembered in history as “al-udat al-sab’a,” or the “Seven qadis” — are among the important sources for understanding how legal thought developed in Transoxiana. Their scholarly lineage also demonstrates the close intellectual ties that connected Bukhara with such ancient centers of learning as Ustrushana, Samarkand, and Fergana.
Throughout history, the names of certain cities have become closely associated with particular branches of learning. Bukhara is one such city. Over the centuries, hadith, tafsir, fiqh, kalam, Sufism, and other disciplines flourished there. At the same time, a rich tradition of legal thought emerged, aimed at ensuring justice in society, resolving disputes, and regulating legal relations.
Among the most prominent representatives of this tradition were the jurists widely known as “al-qudat al-sab’a” — the “seven qadis.”
The “Seven qadis” — a symbol of Bukhara’s legal thought
In Islamic civilization, the institution of the qadi was not merely an administrative office, but one of the key social institutions responsible for upholding justice and legal order in society. A qadi carried out such important duties as hearing disputes, issuing judgments in accordance with the principles of Sharia, and protecting people’s lawful rights and interests.
As Islam became more widely established in Central Asia, this institution also continued to develop. Bukhara, in particular, became known as one of the principal centers of Hanafi jurisprudence.
Historical sources mention a number of jurists who lived in Bukhara and earned widespread respect for their profound knowledge, piety, integrity, and commitment to justice. They came to be known collectively as the “Seven qadis.”
They were not seven qadis who lived at the same time, but rather a succession of distinguished scholars from different periods who engaged in jurisprudence and judicial practice and left behind a rich scholarly legacy. The fact that their graves are located in the historic Chor Bakr Bukhara complex further enhances the historical significance of this site.
For this reason, the complex is also popularly known as “Mazarat al-qudat al-sab’a” — the “Tombs of the seven qadis.”
At the beginning of the scholarly lineage: a native of Ustrushana
One of the most remarkable aspects of the history of the “Seven qadis” is that the scholarly lineage begins with the eminent jurist Abu Ja’far Ustrushani, who hailed from the region of Ustrushana.
His full name was Abu Ja’far Muhammad ibn Amr (Umar) ibn Sulayman Shu’abi (Shabi) Ustrushani. The exact date of his birth is unknown. Sources record his death as having occurred in 400/1010 or 404/1013.
Abu Ja’far Ustrushani received his early education in his native Ustrushana. He later moved to Bukhara, where he served as a qadi and became recognized as one of the leading jurists of his time.
The intellectual connections among major centers of learning such as Ustrushana, Bukhara, and Baghdad played an important role in his scholarly formation. His first teacher was his paternal uncle, Luqman ibn Sha’bi ibn Sulayman Ustrushani.
He subsequently studied under the renowned Bukhara jurist Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Fazl Kamari Bukhari and the distinguished Baghdad-based Hanafi scholar Abu Bakr Ahmad ibn Ali Razi Jassas.
The scholarly lineage of a single scholar’s teachers alone demonstrates how extensively knowledge was exchanged across Transoxiana and the wider Islamic world during that period.
Abu Ja’far Ustrushani also left a significant scholarly legacy. A number of works on Islamic jurisprudence are attributed to him, including al-jami‘ al-kabir, al-ziyadat, and kifayat al-sha’bi.
Kifayat al-Sha‘bi, in particular, is regarded as an important source for studying the development of Hanafi jurisprudence in Transoxiana. Manuscript copies of the work preserved at the Abu Rayhan Beruni Institute of Oriental Studies of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan further attest to its scholarly value.
Abu Zayd Dabusi: a new direction in legal thought
Another prominent representative of the scholarly lineage of the “Seven qadis” was Abu Zayd Dabusi. His full name was Abu Zayd Ubayd Allah ibn Umar ibn Isa Dabusi.
Born in the village of Dabusiya, situated between Bukhara and Samarkand, the scholar served as a qadi during the Qarakhanid period. For this reason, sources also refer to him as “Qadi Zayd.”
One of the aspects for which Dabusi became particularly renowned was his scholarly work in ilm al-khilaf, a discipline devoted to the systematic analysis of differences among juristic opinions.
From the perspective of modern legal studies, the principles of comparing different legal views, examining the evidence supporting them, and reaching a reasoned conclusion on a particular issue are especially noteworthy.
His work Ta’sis al-Nazar is also of particular significance in this regard. It focuses on analyzing juristic questions on a theoretical basis and comparing differing legal opinions.
Abu Zayd Dabusi died in 430/1039 and was buried in the mausoleum of the “Seven qadis.”
One scholarly lineage — several intellectual schools
Other scholars associated with the “Seven qadis” also left an important mark on the development of legal thought in Transoxiana.
Among them, Abu Ibrahim Ismail ibn Muhammad ibn Abdullah Mustamli Bukhari occupies a distinguished place. Living from 358/968 to 434/1043, he was deeply versed in both Islamic jurisprudence and Sufism. His Sharh al-Ta’arruf is regarded as an important part of his scholarly legacy.
Badi’ Din Ahmad ibn Umar Bukhari lived in the twelfth century and became known for his work fatawa badi’ al-din.
Zahir Din Muhammad ibn Ahmad Bukhari served as both qadi and muhtasib of Bukhara. The scholar, who died in 619/1222, authored works including al-fawa’id al-zahiriyya and al-fatawa al-zahiriyya.
Ahmad ibn Amr ibn Musa Bukhari is also mentioned among the scholars who served as qadi in both Samarkand and Bukhara.
The name Zawzani appears as the seventh representative of the lineage. However, since several scholars were known by this nisba, identifying precisely which individual belonged to the “Seven qadis” requires further source-based research.
This demonstrates that certain aspects of the subject have yet to be fully explored.
From the “Seven qadis” to the “Nine qadis”
Interestingly, historical sources also provide differing accounts regarding the number of scholars included among the “Seven qadis.”
Mu’in Fuqara’s Tarikh-i Mullazada contains information about Bukhara’s “Seven qadis” cemetery and the scholars buried there.
In later studies, however, this list was expanded further, and the concept of qudat tis’a — the “Nine qadis” — also entered scholarly discussion.
The Arab researcher Subhi Jamil Khayyat, drawing on Shaykh Shah Wali Allah Dihlawi’s al-Insaf, also includes such scholars as Abu Yusr Bazdawi, Fakhr Islam Bazdawi, Abu Ma’ali Ahmad Bazdawi, and Qadikhan Uzgandi among Bukhara’s great jurists.
Each of them made a major contribution to the development of fiqh and usul al-fiqh in Transoxiana.
Thus, rather than representing a strictly fixed and closed list, the term “Seven qadis” may also be understood as a concept embodying a historical tradition that took shape within Bukhara’s legal and scholarly environment.
A scholarly world extending beyond Bukhara
The study of the history of the “Seven qadis” reveals another important reality: in the medieval period, scholarship was not confined to the boundaries of a particular city or region.
Areas such as Ustrushana, Bukhara, Samarkand, Dabusiya, and Fergana formed an interconnected intellectual and cultural space.
Abu Ja’far Ustrushani’s education in Ustrushana and subsequent activity in Bukhara; Abu Zayd Dabusi’s origins in Dabusiya and his recognition within Bukhara’s scholarly environment; and the association of such scholars as the Bazdawis and Qadikhan Uzgandi with this tradition are vivid examples of such scholarly mobility.
In this sense, the phenomenon of the “Seven qadis” is not merely about Bukhara itself. It also illustrates how legal thought took shape and developed across the wider region of Transoxiana.
The historical roots of a tradition of justice
During the First Renaissance and in the centuries that followed, Transoxiana achieved remarkable advances across various fields of learning. In this broader intellectual development, fiqh and legal thought also established strong scholarly foundations.
The scholarly lineage of the “Seven qadis” represents one important manifestation of this process.
Their lives and works gave significant attention to such issues as justice, legal order, the regulation of relations among people, and the resolution of disputes on the basis of knowledge and jurisprudence.
For this reason, studying the legacy of the “Seven qadis” is not merely an inquiry into the lives of historical figures. It also helps us understand how the scholarly foundations of legal culture and concepts of justice were formed in Central Asia.
Today, it is particularly important to conduct in-depth research into the manuscripts associated with these scholars, reconstruct their teacher–student scholarly lineages, comparatively analyze information found in different sources, and make their intellectual legacy more widely accessible to the public.
Indeed, Bukhara’s “Seven qadis” represent more than the history of a single period or a single city. They are a vivid expression of the centuries-old tradition of justice, scholarship, and legal thought that developed in Transoxiana.
Muslim Atayev, Doctor of Historical Sciences (DSc), iccu.uz